CFPB Revises Mortgage Servicing Proposal
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has revised its 2024 mortgage servicing proposal, signaling potential changes to its final rule as it moves forward with the White House Office of Management and Budget…


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has sent a revised version of its 2024 mortgage servicing proposal to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, signaling a potential narrowing of the final rule compared to the original proposal (1). The revised proposal, titled 'Streamlining Mortgage Servicing for Borrowers Experiencing Payment Difficulties,' is under Regulation X and is expected to reflect the CFPB's current priorities, which favor clear, fixed rules over open-ended frameworks (1). [1]
Industry attorneys suggest that the final rule may be significantly narrower than the 2024 proposal, which was developed when the CFPB was led by Rohit Chopra (1). The American Bankers Association (ABA) has urged the CFPB to finalize only a limited portion of the 2024 proposal, arguing that servicers are already committed to helping struggling borrowers, as evidenced by sustained low foreclosure rates and high customer satisfaction rates (1). [1]
The 2024 proposal aimed to make permanent several pandemic-era practices that assisted borrowers during the crisis, with estimates indicating that 8.8 million families were helped (1). The proposal included provisions such as allowing servicers to evaluate loss-mitigation options before borrowers complete an application and prohibiting late fees during loss-mitigation reviews (1). However, industry experts expect the final rule to drop some of these provisions, including the proposed ban on fee accrual during loss-mitigation reviews and language access provisions (1). [1]
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) last week took another step toward finalizing new loss-mitigation standards, sending a revised version of its 2024 mortgage servicing proposal to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review (1). The final rule, 'Streamlining Mortgage Servicing for Borrowers Experiencing Payment Difficulties' under Regulation X, is expected to be narrower than the 2024 proposal advanced when the CFPB was led by Rohit Chopra, according to industry attorneys (1). The move comes in the wake of President Donald Trump’s March 13 executive order, 'Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit,' which directs the CFPB to modernize Dodd-Frank-era rules that lenders and servicers say increase compliance costs (1). [1]
Advertisement
The CFPB received more than 80 comments on the proposal, with what the attorneys described as an 'unusual degree of convergence' among groups that rarely agree (1). The American Bankers Association (ABA) has urged the CFPB to finalize only a limited portion of the 2024 proposal, pressing the bureau to focus on targeted changes rather than a full rewrite (1). 'The Bureau’s 2024 proposal was founded on the misconception that servicers prioritize foreclosure over helping borrowers find a successful solution to resolve their payment disruptions,' Teshale Smith, the ABA’s senior counsel for regulatory compliance and policy, said in a letter to the CFPB in June (1). [1]
The 2024 proposed rule aimed to make permanent several pandemic-era practices used when large numbers of borrowers needed fast assistance (1). Industry estimates showed that 8.8 million families were helped, with the re-default rate for loans exiting COVID-19 loss-mitigation programs at about 10%, ABA said in its letter (1). The proposal allows servicers to evaluate loss-mitigation options before borrowers complete an application, prohibits late fees and other charges while a loss-mitigation review is underway, and makes assistance possible in multiple languages (1). [1]
The CFPB has sent a revised version of its 2024 mortgage servicing proposal to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, signaling a potential narrowing of the final rule compared to the original proposal (1). Industry attorneys suggest that the final rule may be significantly narrower than the 2024 proposal, which was developed when the CFPB was led by Rohit Chopra (1). The 2024 proposal aimed to make permanent several pandemic-era practices that assisted borrowers during the crisis, with estimates indicating that 8.8 million families were helped (1). [1]
The CFPB received more than 80 comments on the proposal, with what the attorneys described as an 'unusual degree of convergence' among groups that rarely agree (1). The 2024 proposed rule aimed to make permanent several pandemic-era practices used when large numbers of borrowers needed fast assistance (1). [1]
Advertisement
The move comes in the wake of President Donald Trump’s March 13 executive order, 'Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit,' which directs the CFPB to modernize Dodd-Frank-era rules that lenders and servicers say increase compliance costs (1). The current standards were finalized in 2013 (1). [1]
The American Bankers Association (ABA) has urged the CFPB to finalize only a limited portion of the 2024 proposal, pressing the bureau to focus on targeted changes rather than a full rewrite (1). [1]
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) last week took another step toward finalizing new loss-mitigation standards, sending a revised version of its 2024 mortgage servicing proposal to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review (1). The final rule, 'Streamlining Mortgage Servicing for Borrowers Experiencing Payment Difficulties' under Regulation X, is expected to be narrower than the 2024 proposal advanced when the CFPB was led by Rohit Chopra, according to industry attorneys. The CFPB did not immediately reply to HousingWire's request for comments. The move comes in the wake of President Donald Trump's March 13 executive order, 'Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit,' which directs the CFPB to modernize Dodd-Frank-era rules that lenders and servicers say increase compliance costs. [1]
The CFPB received more than 80 comments on the proposal, with what the attorneys described as an 'unusual degree of convergence' among groups that rarely agree (1). The American Bankers Association (ABA) has urged the CFPB to finalize only a limited portion of the 2024 proposal, pressing the bureau to focus on targeted changes rather than a full rewrite. 'The Bureau's 2024 proposal was founded on the misconception that servicers prioritize foreclosure over helping borrowers find a successful solution to resolve their payment disruptions,' Teshale Smith, the ABA's senior counsel for regulatory compliance and policy, said in a letter to the CFPB in June. [1]
Advertisement
The 2024 proposed rule aimed to make permanent several pandemic-era practices used when large numbers of borrowers needed fast assistance (1). Industry estimates showed that 8.8 million families were helped, with the re-default rate for loans exiting COVID-19 loss-mitigation programs at about 10%, ABA said in its letter. The proposal allows servicers to evaluate loss-mitigation options before borrowers complete an application, prohibits late fees and other charges while a loss-mitigation review is underway, and makes assistance possible in multiple languages. [1]
Sources
Prepared with AI assistance from the cited sources.
The Cali Reporter newsletter
The stories worth your time.
California, the country, and what comes next. Join our free newsletter for reporting that keeps you informed.
More in Housing
- Housing Inventory and New Listings Reflect Seasonal and Rate-Driven Trends
Recent housing market data shows a seasonal decline in inventory and new listings, influenced by mortgage rate fluctuations and broader economic factors.
- Residential AD&C Credit Conditions Remain Tight in Q3 2026
A recent survey by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) reveals that credit conditions for residential land acquisition, development, and construction (AD&C) loans continued to tighten in the third quarter…
- Midwest Housing Markets Show Resilience in Buyer Demand
Midwest housing markets are demonstrating resilience in buyer demand despite national trends of flat or declining purchase mortgage activity, with pending sales keeping pace with new listings in several key cities.