Polymarket Market Maker Bot Analytics
This article explores the development of a performance analytics system for a Polymarket market maker bot, focusing on the calculation of realized and unrealized profit and loss, inventory tracking, and execution…

A Polymarket trading bot must employ performance analytics to determine whether it is generating profit, as executing thousands of orders does not guarantee financial success. Factors such as narrow spreads, high trading fees, and adverse market movements can significantly impact profitability. For example, a bot may buy YES tokens at $0.47 and sell them at $0.50, generating a gross profit of $3.00, but after deducting fees of $0.20, the net profit is reduced to $2.80. Proper analytics are essential to understand the true performance of the bot and identify areas for improvement (Dev.to, 2023). [1]
Realized and unrealized profit and loss (P&L) are key metrics in assessing a trading bot's performance. Realized P&L represents profit or loss from closed positions, while unrealized P&L reflects the estimated profit or loss from open positions. For example, if a bot buys 100 YES shares at $0.47 and sells 50 at $0.50, the remaining 50 shares are subject to market fluctuations. If the market price drops, the realized profit may be positive, but the overall position could still be losing value. This distinction is crucial for accurate performance evaluation (Dev.to, 2023). [1]
Tracking inventory and average cost is essential for maintaining accurate P&L calculations. A trading bot must update its cost basis after every buy and sell transaction to reflect the actual cost of the inventory. For instance, if a bot executes four trades involving 100 YES shares bought at $0.47, 60 sold at $0.50, 40 bought at $0.48, and 30 sold at $0.51, the remaining inventory's cost basis must be recalculated to ensure precise P&L tracking. This approach helps avoid misallocation of realized and unrealized profits (Dev.to, 2023). [1]
Fill rate and execution quality are important indicators of a trading bot's performance. Fill rate measures the percentage of submitted order quantity that is executed, while execution quality considers the impact of adverse selection and post-fill markouts. A high fill rate does not necessarily equate to profitability, as it may indicate stale quotes or unfavorable market movements. For example, a bot may have a 75% fill rate but still incur a net loss due to adverse selection, where the market moves against its execution (Dev.to, 2023). [1]
Advertisement
Realized and unrealized P&L are key metrics in assessing a Polymarket trading bot's performance (Dev.to). Realized P&L represents profit or loss from positions that have been closed or settled. For example, buying 100 YES shares at $0.47 and selling them at $0.50 results in a realized gross P&L of $3.00. Subtracting attributable fees and costs provides the realized net P&L. Unrealized P&L, on the other hand, represents the estimated profit or loss on positions still held. If the current mark is $0.51 for 100 YES shares with an average cost of $0.47, the unrealized gross P&L is $4.00. However, this is not guaranteed profit due to potential slippage and market depth. [1]
Tracking inventory and average cost is essential for maintaining accurate P&L calculations (Dev.to). A simplified example illustrates this: after executing four trades, the bot's inventory and cost basis are calculated using a weighted-average method. For instance, buying 100 YES shares at $0.47 and 40 at $0.48 results in an average cost of approximately $0.472857. Selling 60 and 30 shares at $0.50 and $0.51 respectively leads to a realized gross P&L of $2.742857. The remaining inventory is valued at $24.50, resulting in an unrealized gross P&L of $0.857143. These figures help determine the bot's overall performance before fees. [1]
Fill rate and execution quality are important indicators of a trading bot's performance (Dev.to). Fill rate is calculated as the percentage of submitted order quantity that was executed. For example, if a bot submits 1,000 units and fills 400, the fill rate is 40%. However, a higher fill rate does not always equate to better performance, as it may indicate stale quotes or adverse selection. Execution quality can also be measured by tracking adverse selection, where the market moves against the bot's execution. This is calculated using post-fill markouts, which compare the execution price to the future midpoint. A negative markout indicates unfavorable execution, and tracking these intervals helps understand market behavior after fills. [1]
Sources
Prepared with AI assistance from the cited sources.
The Cali Reporter newsletter
The stories worth your time.
California, the country, and what comes next. Join our free newsletter for reporting that keeps you informed.
More in Technology
- Google Play's Closed Testing Requirements and the Importance of Feedback
Google Play's closed testing rule emphasizes the need for developers to gather meaningful feedback from testers, not just track app installs. This approach ensures that real user experiences are evaluated and addressed…
- World Diabetes Day 2026 Focuses on Early Diagnosis and Awareness
The 2026 World Diabetes Day campaign emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis, equitable access to care, and reducing diabetes stigma, according to the WHO. The theme 'Early action on diabetes' highlights the need…
- Understanding Memory Usage on Linux VPS
This article explains how to accurately interpret memory usage on a Linux VPS, focusing on the importance of the 'available' metric and the potential pitfalls of relying on the 'free' column.
